Story-ideas-1011172

Op-eds

Criticism of Israel: Whose right is it, anyway?

  • Sifrin Geoff HOME
It is not unusual for elder South African politicians to use their anti-apartheid struggle credentials as political capital, as if their views are superior to others.
by GEOFF SIFRIN | Nov 30, 2017

The issue found a reverse echo in Israel last week, when Israel’s Deputy Foreign Minister Tzipi Hotovely - an ardent right-winger and settlement supporter - contemptuously criticised American Jews who “never send their children to fight for their country (America)… most of them are having quite convenient lives”. And they don’t really care about the Kotel, she added.

She, on the other hand, lives in Israel and serves in the IDF, as if that makes her views superior to Jews who don’t - which means most American Jews. Her comments outraged sections of American Jewry. A response in Israeli media from a high-ranking US military officer, listed Jews who fought with the US army in the Second World War, and hold high military positions today.

Hotovely also disparages Diaspora Jews who criticise Israel’s weakening of liberal values, and the occupation. Sadly, many American Jews - the world’s second largest Jewish community after Israel - who are overwhelmingly liberal, do not see Israel as part of their identity, but a problem, evoking antagonism from other people because of the occupation.

US Jews dislike racism and religious extremism. Despite being only two per cent of America’s population, they played a huge part in the civil rights movement, and continue to do so in culture, the arts, politics and the economy.

Their relationship with Israel has weakened as the country has moved towards right-wing extremism and nationalism. If they have a Reform or Conservative religious identity - as the majority of American Jews do - they accuse Israel of acting arrogantly as if it held a copyright on Judaism. They perceive Israel’s Orthodox establishment as being contemptuous of other streams.

Israel was created as a worldwide Jewish project to be a moral, democratic state for all inhabitants, with the intention of being intimately connected to the Diaspora. Do Israeli public officials have the right to criticise Diaspora communities? Could Hotovely’s attack on US Jews also be applied to South African Jewry?

And should South African Jews criticise Israel, against the accusation that they don’t live there, face Middle East dangers, serve in the IDF, and so on?

South African Jewish institutions are loath to criticise Israel, believing it gives ammunition to anti-Israel groups such as BDS. The recent controversy provoked by a Johannesburg Reform shul inviting people with BDS connections to its sukkah, highlighted the issue.

At Israeli-oriented events such as Yom Ha’atzmaut in Johannesburg, left-wing Jews demonstrate against Israeli actions, and promote the Palestinian cause, evoking anger among mainstream Jewry. Even moderate Jewish groups who support Israel passionately, but demand an end to the occupation of Palestinian territories, are often branded - without any evidence - as belonging to BDS in order to silence them. They are accused of being traitors.

The South African political environment is receptive to attacks on Israel. Deputy Secretary General of the African National Congress Jesse Duarte, for example, published an article in the Daily Maverick this week in anticipation of the ANC leadership conference later this month, saying: “Israel has continued to violate international law, occupation continues and the brutality of the Israeli system of oppression has, rightly, been likened to apartheid… As the ANC therefore prepares for its national conference, South Africa’s future relations with Israel hangs in the balance and rightly so.”

For South African Jews who support Israel but oppose the occupation, it is a difficult line to tread. But it must not stifle meaningful debate about Israel, including praise and criticism where necessary. Like South African struggle veterans’ critiques of the ANC and South Africa, this kind of engagement is crucial for people to identity with Israel.

Read Geoff Sifrin’s regular columns on his blog sifrintakingissue.wordpress.com

 

2 Comments

  1. 2 Gary Selikow 30 Nov
    Gee. why would anyone assume that someone who does not live with the dangers Israelis face, should from their comfortable vantage point be careful of attacking Israel for defending herself or telling Israel how to do so?
    So according to Sifrin logic leftwing diaspora Jews should be free to criticize Israel but no one (least of all Israelis) should have a right to respond, less they be called 'bigoted rightwing zionists' i/e only the liberals/left are entitled to view, not those terrible nationalists/zionists.
  2. 1 nat cheiman 09 Dec
    I think it does make her views superior to those that don't live in Israel.
    The problem with left wing ( liberals) is that they shout the house down and when the proverbial cr*p hits the fan they are nowhere to be found.
    The liberals of Y2k are a despicable unintelligent bunch that care only about their views and discard the factual position on the ground.

Comment

  1. RadEditor - HTML WYSIWYG Editor. MS Word-like content editing experience thanks to a rich set of formatting tools, dropdowns, dialogs, system modules and built-in spell-check.
    RadEditor's components - toolbar, content area, modes and modules
       
    Toolbar's wrapper 
     
    Content area wrapper
    RadEditor's bottom area: Design, Html and Preview modes, Statistics module and resize handle.
    It contains RadEditor's Modes/views (HTML, Design and Preview), Statistics and Resizer
    Editor Mode buttonsStatistics moduleEditor resizer
      
    RadEditor's Modules - special tools used to provide extra information such as Tag Inspector, Real Time HTML Viewer, Tag Properties and other.
       

Injure

 

Follow us on

Newsletter