Phyllis Jowell move to Tafelberg hangs in the balance

  • Tafelberg site
The Cape Town Jewish community will have to wait at least six months before a judgement is made on the Tafelberg case, which saw the Phyllis Jowell Jewish Day School (PJJDS) caught in a battle between the City of Cape Town, the Western Cape government, the national department of human settlements, and housing activists.
by TALI FEINBERG | Dec 05, 2019

The school took a decision a while ago to optimise its current location in Camps Bay pending the outcome of the case. This was because it “can’t operate in strategic limbo”, says PJJDS director Lance Katz. However, “the original motivation for Tafelberg remains, and would be a big boost to the school”, he says.

Reclaim the City and Ndifuna Ukwazi (NU) took the province and the City of Cape Town to court for selling the former Tafelberg school property to PJJDS for R135 million in 2017 instead of using it for social housing.

The human settlements department launched a separate case against the province for not consulting the national minister prior to making the decision to sell. Matters were eventually heard in the Western Cape High Court last week.

NU is a non-profit organisation that works to advance urban land justice in Cape Town. Reclaim the City is a movement of tenants and workers to end displacement from well-located areas and to secure access to affordable housing.

After five days of court proceedings, Judge Patrick Gamble said the earliest possible time for a decision would be in May or June 2020.

“You’ve given us lots to think about, it’s going to take time,” Gamble said. “This matter has huge ramifications. We would like to encourage legal representatives and parties not to lose sight that this case has a long way to go. We encourage the parties to engage with each other as much as possible to see if there’s any aspect that can be resolved together,” he said.

The PJJDS is a small play school and primary school that caters to children from the ages of 18 months to Grade 6, and blends secular and religious education. The school is situated in a relatively small space at the back of the Camps Bay shul, and would be better suited to a larger more central area like Tafelberg.

When PJJDS tendered for the site, its leadership had no inkling of the dispute that would erupt. “At the time of the PJJDS tender for Tafelberg, there was no public controversy surrounding the Tafelberg site,” Katz told the SA Jewish Report.

“In May 2015, the Western Cape government issued a tender to dispose of the property. PJJDS tendered in good faith, and was selected as the preferred bidder based on the rules and criteria of the tender. Objections to the province’s disposal of the site emerged only after PJJDS had already been selected as the preferred bidder,” says Katz.

He says the Tafelberg site represents a “once-in-a-generation opportunity to address a broad range of vital Jewish community needs along with other benefits to the wider Capetonian population. PJJDS had been looking for an alternative site as a result of town planning problems and capacity issues. The school had exhausted all avenues to expand on its current campus or find an alternative site within the catchment area.

“When the Tafelberg site was put up for sale by the province, it gave new hope to PJJDS for a viable solution, hence its decision to bid. It is already zoned for a school, has a school building which we plan to upgrade, and is very well-located in the heart of the school’s catchment area. Added to this, there is a plan for the possible relocation of Jewish old-aged facility, Highlands House, to Tafelberg.

“Everybody agrees that housing is a critically important basic need, and the province and city have a long way to go in addressing it,” Katz says. “For our part, should we be successful, we have committed to building 44 affordable housing units on the site entirely at our own cost without any reliance on scarce state resources. This is almost four times as many units as existed previously in Tafelberg,” he says. This was also explained thoroughly in court.

“It’s unfortunate that we have been drawn into a matter not of our choosing, and that at times, particularly early on, the dispute was wrongly positioned as a ‘Jewish community versus social housing’ debate.

“However, as time has passed, this has settled down, and the focus has shifted away from the Jewish community to the real issue of the case which is where and how national government, the province, and the city implements a coherent, efficient, and sustainable housing strategy. Also, it has moved to whether in this context, the decision of the province to sell Tafelberg to PJJDS was permissible and valid.”

He says it’s important for the community “to be patient, to respect the process, and respect the diversity of opinions that exist within and without our community on this matter. The school itself has been successful in minimising the impact of the case on pupils, parents, staff, and the governance structures of the school.”

A number of Jewish activists vehemently protested against the sale to PJJDS, and more than 250 Cape Town Jews sent a petition to the Western Cape government in March 2017, saying, “We, Jewish Capetonians, call for social housing in Sea Point and on other sites in an inclusive Cape Town.”

However, this group appears to have dissolved. One of the group’s leaders, Daniel Linde, says it has “not been active in years. It was really organised to make a statement of support. It was never a formal group, just a group of people expressing support for Reclaim the City’s case. Time has lagged between then and the case being heard.”

NU Executive Director Mandisa Shandu told the SA Jewish Report, “Our position in relation to Tafelberg is that land is a critical transformative tool. This position held by NU is irrespective of the identity of the purchaser. The challenge in the Tafelberg matter primarily concerns the state’s constitutional obligation to redress spatial injustice and advance access to affordable housing.”

1 Comment

  1. 1 Selwyn Levin 05 Dec
    Has any one Googled NU, their funders and RTC, who went on a street march only a few days ago? It really and truly looked like about 50 rent -a-crowd folks. I wonder if the funders have done their homework and studied where their funds have really gone. Be that as it may.
    A few years ago ,I had to find accomodation for my late mom's carer. I was sent to the 'house keeper' at Somerset Hospital. At the time 2 of the 3 murses homes were locked and boarded. This about 100 units. The open unit was about half full, say another 20 to 30 units. With these spaces and the nurses hom adjacent to Fort Wyngart,there should be in excess of 200 potential "dwelling units" for accomodation. 
    Secondly, there are huge areas to the left and right of the N1. Railway unused space ,Airforce/army unused space.  Even the area in Pinelands where the the Conradie(?) hospital was. Yes, it coud be earmarked for other reasons but there is ample space. There is even the bowling green in Claremont that is unused municipal space for the last 20 odd years.In any case, I am sure there there are politacal noises behind the scenes, especially when one sees a few names.


  1. RadEditor - HTML WYSIWYG Editor. MS Word-like content editing experience thanks to a rich set of formatting tools, dropdowns, dialogs, system modules and built-in spell-check.
    RadEditor's components - toolbar, content area, modes and modules
    Toolbar's wrapper 
    Content area wrapper
    RadEditor's bottom area: Design, Html and Preview modes, Statistics module and resize handle.
    It contains RadEditor's Modes/views (HTML, Design and Preview), Statistics and Resizer
    Editor Mode buttonsStatistics moduleEditor resizer
    RadEditor's Modules - special tools used to provide extra information such as Tag Inspector, Real Time HTML Viewer, Tag Properties and other.





Yad Aharon GENERIC2020


Follow us on