Subscribe to our Newsletter


click to dowload our latest edition

CLICK HEE TO SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Israel

AP and CNN claim Israel shot journalist

Published

on

The Palestinian American journalist killed while reporting on an Israeli military raid on a West Bank refugee camp was probably shot by the Israeli military, according to the findings of two different investigations released on Tuesday, 24 May, by Associated Press and CNN.

The unresolved 11 May death of Shireen Abu Akleh, a venerated Al Jazeera journalist, has turned into a major international firestorm, as Israeli authorities insist it was possible she was killed by a Palestinian militant, while the Palestinian government has refused to co-operate on a joint investigation. Last week, 57 House Democrats called for a United States (US) probe into Abu Akleh’s killing, angering Israel’s ambassador to the US. Israeli police also rushed mourners at her funeral after they claimed funeral goers were throwing stones.

Through extensive audio and video analysis – although neither outlet had access to video showing the moment of her death – along with eyewitness interviews, AP and CNN determined that an Israeli convoy was the most probable source of the bullet that killed the journalist.

CNN further suggested that Abu Akleh died in a “targeted attack”, citing other journalists who served as eyewitnesses, and said that there had been no active exchange of gunfire with Palestinians and that the Israeli convoy had fired on journalists who had moved through the area as a group.

Returning to the location of her death and using GPS technology to map out the surrounding area, the outlets individually found that the Israeli convoy was closer and in a more direct line of sight to Abu Akleh’s location, while the nearest Palestinian militants who could have fired in her direction were behind them. Strike marks in the surrounding area and a reconstructed timeline of the convoy’s arrival also appeared to support the conclusion that she was hit by Israeli artillery, the reports said.

Parsing of available video of Abu Akleh’s killing, including video taken and released by Israeli forces, also ruled out other Palestinian suspects based on their relative locations.

Israel’s own official investigation into the incident is ongoing, with the government saying it needs the Palestinian Authority (PA) to hand over the bullet that killed Abu Akleh in order to perform a full ballistics assessment. Separately, the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) recently said it wouldn’t pursue a criminal investigation into her killing, though it’s continuing to investigate the source of the bullet.

The PA, meanwhile, has called on the International Criminal Court to investigate the matter, and insists it won’t co-operate with Israeli investigators, citing past investigations of Israeli misconduct toward Palestinians that were dragged out or quietly dismissed. Israeli Defense Minister Benny Gantz said that any referral of the case to the Hague would harm Israeli-Palestinian relations.

In addition to CNN’s findings, Al Jazeera and the PA both allege that Abu Akleh was deliberately targeted by Israeli soldiers, a charge beyond the scope of the AP’s findings, and one that Israel has emphatically denied. The journalist was wearing an outfit clearly labelling her as “press” at the time of her death.

A letter published by Artists for Palestine UK and signed by 126 artists and celebrities, including Tilda Swinton, Mark Ruffalo, and Peter Gabriel, is calling for “accountability” for Abu Akleh’s death.

Last weekend in Jenin, during a raid on the same West Bank refugee camp where Abu Akleh was killed, Israeli forces also shot dead a 17-year-old Palestinian who had been wearing Hamas and Islamic Jihad clothing. The IDF said in a statement that it was returning gunfire after violence had broken out.

Continue Reading
1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. ROSALIE DONADIO

    May 26, 2022 at 10:07 pm

    “claiming”, “assume”, “probably”, “possibly”, is there no longer investigative reporting in journalism? And,then,why not hand over the bullet? is it because it would indicate another finding (other than the “official” claim presented by the Palestinian agenda) … I find this suspect; but there is no longer investigatory results under consideration … there remains only opinion and a manipulated one as well.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.