Subscribe to our Newsletter


click to dowload our latest edition

Is Banda using plane free & buying Paramount boats?

Ivor and Eric Ichikowitz’ names came out prominently in the UK media last week after being linked to a Malawian corruption scandal that has alarmed donors, mainly the UK. But it may all be sour grapes. The Brits seem to feel the R2-bil in financial aid which they give Malawi annually should not be spent with SA arms suppliers.

Published

on

Jewish News

ANT KATZ

UK gives Malawi R2.13-bil a year

Malawian president Joyce Banda faces questions over her free use of the private jet, apparently sold to the Ichikowitz brothers’ arms firms, which were then rewarded with government contracts to buy military hardware.

The local “TIMES” newspaper ran a banner on Thursday reading “Malawian president linked to SA-owned arms company” – and “Paramount signed a deal to have boats patrol Lake Malawi.”

The Paramount Group is run by the South African brothers Ivor and Eric Ichikowitz and specialises in manufacturing armoured vehicles and unmanned aerial vehicles. But Paramount also manufactures a range of naval boats ranging in size from just 8.5m to 42m (SEE SHORT VIDEO ABOVE).  

Ichikowitz - Ivor - Paramount HOMEBanda ostensibly sold the presidential jet as a sign that she would not tolerate the corruption that took hold of Malawi under her predecessor, Bingu wa Mutharika.

RIGHT: Ivor Ichikowitz

Reports in Malawi suggest that since the plane was sold Banda has used it regularly to travel to events around the continent. She embarked on 20 private plane flights in just three months, it was said.

Asked who paid for the use of the jet, her spokesman said it was “well-wishers” who “have told us not to disclose their identities”.

The Dassault Falcon 900EX was bought by Bohnox Enterprises, a firm registered in the British Virgin Islands, and then sent to SA, where it is loaned to VIPs by the jet company Fortune Air.

Both companies are linked to the Ichikowitz’ Paramount Group, Africa’s largest private defence and aerospace firm.

Paramount Group has already signed deals with the Malawian government for agriculture, fuel and military contracts through a network of investment firms.

Brits peeved off at our lads?

It seems from the media reports that the UK government are feeling peeved that they are providing financial aid to Malawi which is then spending it with Paramount – and, presumably, not British suppliers. None of the news reports, however, suggest that Malawi is obliged to buy British.

Ichikowitz - Ivor & Zev - Zuma book
Ivor Ichikowitz is a major sponsor of Board activities. He is seen here with SAJBD president Zev Krengel at the launch of the “Jewish Memories of Mandela” book which he contributed towards.


In November, The Daily Telegraph revealed that a family foundation run by the directors of Paramount was paying for Bell Pottinger, a London PR firm, to burnish Banda’s image. In that situation, Mrs Banda’s spokesman had previously also refused to identify the “well-wishers” paying for the PR operation.

At about the same time, Paramount signed a deal with Malawi to provide seven interceptor boats to patrol Lake Malawi.

Britain, which in 2012 spent £117-million (R2.13-billion at today’s exchange rate) supporting Malawi, has said it is seeking “greater clarity” from Banda about the “concerning” revelations.

“It is particularly concerning if there is a nexus between the selling of the jet, the buying of boats and the Paramount Group,” Michael Nevin, the UK High Commissioner to Malawi, said.

No comment from Malawi

Banda’s spokesman, Steve Nhlane, would neither confirm nor deny whether Paramount Group or any of its associated companies had provided any free travel.

Duncan Halliday, a spokesman for Fortune Air, confirmed the company had leased planes “on occasion” to Banda. “All costs for the leasing of aircraft for the president of Malawi have been settled in full by a number of third-party donors,” he said.

He declined to say if Paramount Group was among the third-party donors.

Mrs Banda is currently dealing with a major scandal over corrupt procurement deals made by government departments, leading foreign donors including Britain to suspend direct aid that had accounted for 40 per cent of the impoverished country’s budget.

Is Paramount providing jet for Banda?

Mrs Banda was photographed standing on the tarmac next to her former plane in Nairobi in December, and next to another Fortune Air plane in Harare in April last year. Steve Nhlane, Mrs Banda’s spokesman, said “well-wishers” supplied the jets for free and there was no cost to the Malawi taxpayer.

 

Ichikowitz - Banda - Paramount
The UK Telegraph ran this pic of Banda (inset) and her ex-jet

 

Asked who the well-wishers were, he replied: “You do not have to know them. Besides, they have told us not to disclose their identities. That is what friends are meant for, for helping each other.”

Pressed on the matter, he said that the costs were “usually” borne by whoever had invited Mrs Banda to attend an event. For example, the Southern African Development Community (SADC) paid for her, as the current chairman of the organisation, to travel on its behalf.

Leefa Martin, a spokesman for SADC, responded that she had “never heard” of the organisation paying for the travel of African heads of state. “How can he not know how the travel of his boss is paid for?” she asked.

Mr Nhlane would neither confirm nor deny whether Paramount Group or any of its associated companies had provided any travel for free. “The president has been accepting any appropriate means of transport available,” he said. “We are now going towards an election campaign and people will say anything to dent the image of the president.”

Mr Halliday, the Fortune Air spokesman, confirmed that the company had leased planes “on occasion” to Mrs Banda. “All costs for the leasing of aircrafts for the President of Malawi have been settled in full by a number of third party donors,” he said.

He declined to say whether Paramount Group was among the third party donors, adding that further details could not be given “for legal and high-level security reasons”.

Robert Phiri, executive director of the Malawi Public Affairs Committee, a watchdog, said if the government had “nothing to hide”, it should be open about who was funding Mrs Banda’s transport. “At the moment, no one believes what they say,” he said.

Banda - JoycePICTURED LEFT: President Banda

“No one would believe that companies provide things entirely for free — that’s not how it works.”

Malawi’s government has said that the money raised by the presidential jet sale would go to the Malawi military to fund “peacekeeping operations” while the rest would go to agriculture and restocking medical supplies.

Paramount Group is run by the South African brothers Ivor and Eric Ichikowitz and specialises in manufacturing armoured vehicles and unmanned aerial vehicles. It previously brokered a deal for the Malawian government to equip its peacekeeping troops in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Trans Africa Capital, a venture capital firm run by Eric Ichikowitz, has also signed agriculture and fuel contracts with Malawi’s government.

Continue Reading
1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. Ricky Shaw

    Jan 29, 2014 at 8:41 pm

    ‘It seems to me that many heads of state in Africa derive 

    part of their ”income” from corruption.Obviously the leaders don’t fall under any type of fica regulations and are not required to make any asset disclosures.

    I wonder if they pay any type of income tax.’

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Jewish News

Chassidic lego on offer

An American Jewish mother came up with the idea to build a Star Wars-inspired Lego shul – including the Legovitcher Rebbe and chassidim. She is trying to crowdfund her “Beis Death Star”, titling her episode “The Brickovicher Rebbe Returns”. In the illustration the Legovitcher Rebbe is seen leading his chassidim into battle…

Published

on

By

ANT KATZ

Tobey Finklestein dreamed up the idea and she’s trying to make it something with which other parents and kids can have fun with. She started a Kickstarter (online crowdfunding) appeal to pay for the project and have it on the market by Pesach. The self-described “Jewish-Asian tiger mom” said she came up with the idea after her 10-year-old came asking for the “Lego Death Star”.

StarWars 1-3Now he is likely to get a Jewish version of it. 

Those who donate (a minimum of $18) to help build the first intergalactic shul – Beis Death Star Kochav Chaim – will be rewarded with their “very own Brickovicker Chasid,” she says.


A Brickover Rebbe

So far just $333 has been pledged by 11 backers towards Toby’s goal of raising $1 200. The offer expires on March 26.

Funders each get their own, unique Chassid, built of Lego bricks, says Tobey. Not only that, she also promises to throw in extras for the bigger backers. These include:

  • A fly rubber streimel compatible with most Lego minifig heads and a custom torso assembly bearing the “Chassid” logo
  • A personalised certificate of lifetime membership to Beis Death Star Kochav Chaim, including:
    • An invitation to our Chanukahs Habayis (inauguration)
    • A mission from the Brickovicker Rebbe
    • Self-determination of your Brickovickers Special Power
    • Discounted High Holiday seats
    • Access to the Brickovicker community on Facebook to share the exploits of Brickovickers far and wide, received when you order your Brickovicker and become a founding backer ($18+):

Tobey says her goal is to have a little fun with her family, build and disseminate her own woman-owned and operated sect of Chassidim, and generate enough revenue to build the first intergalactic shul with her kids.


StarWars


StarWars Rebbe leads the charge


Continue Reading

Jewish News

Dershowitz hopes Trump will make him proud

Prominent Jewish commentator on Israel, lawyer and academic, Alan Dershowitz, a lifelong Democrat, said in Detroit last week that his “greatest hope is that four years from now I’ll be proud to cast a vote for Donald Trump. As a patriotic American I want him to succeed.

Published

on

By

OWN CORRESPONDENT

“I can predict exactly what will happen in the next four years. It will be unpredictable. That is both Trump’s strength and his weakness,” he said at the city’s Temple Bet El. 

Turning to the Middle East, Dershowitz said: “The primary obstacle to peace is the Palestinians’ unwillingness to recognise Israel as the nation state of the Jewish people. 

“(Former President Barack) Obama was wrong when he said that Israel was created because of the Holocaust. Israel was created because of Zionism, a movement that long predated the Holocaust.

“I think President Obama honestly believes that he has done what is good for Israel. He is wrong. Jimmy Carter hates Israel. He is anti-Israel. President Obama is not. But the Security Council Resolution is just dumb. They could have taken the Jewish areas of Jerusalem out of the resolution, but they didn’t.”

The four main settlement blocs could all be incorporated into Israel and traded for other land. The farther-flung settlements were a provocation, but the settlements were not the primary obstacle to peace. 

“In the last eight years Israel’s military has remained strong and it has maintained a qualitative edge over other armies. The US supported Israel when it went into Gaza. Nobody should call Barack Obama anti-Israel. Nobody should call Barack Obama anti-Semitic.”

He said nobody yet knows what Obama’s role would be as a former president. Some former leaders have had immensely positive roles after their terms. It was important for Israel to try to increase its ties to China, Russia, Africa, South America…

“We have a great weapon, emet, truth. We need to teach our children not the propaganda, but the nuances, the complexities and they will be prepared to make the case for Israel,” he stressed. 

“The case for moving the embassy is strengthened by the Security Council Resolution. The threat of violence should not deter us. That encourages more acts of violence.”

Americans should take a stepped approach – state the policy of moving its embassy to west Jerusalem and talk to Arab allies about it. It should not just be moved now.

The American Jewish advocacy group, J Street, had “moved left of the hard left in Israel. They supported the UN Security Council Resolution. Nobody in Israel supported the UN resolution. It declares the Kotel and the Jewish quarter of Jerusalem to be occupied territory. I do not consider J Street to be a pro-Israel organisation.” 

Dershowitz had strong words for the Boycott, Sanctions and Divestment movement (BDS).

“No university in the US will accept BDS, because we will fight fire with fire. If you implement BDS against Israel, we’ll implement BDS against your university.”

 

By courtesy of Detroit’s Temple Beth El Assistant Rabbi Megan Brudney and Cantor Rachel Gottlieb Kalmowitz

 

  • Former South African Tessa Goldberg was the Beth El executive director for many years.

 

 

 

Continue Reading

Jewish News

Berlin highlights divide among German Jewry

Even before the deadly attack on a Christmas market in Berlin, Jews in Germany were divided in their approach to the arrival of hundreds of thousands of immigrants from Muslim countries since 2014.

Published

on

By

TOBY AXELROD

Citing a Jewish moral duty to aid the displaced, many Jewish organisations, synagogue groups and individuals have rallied to help the newcomers, including asylum seekers fleeing the civil war in Syria. But some Jews have warned that the influx of immigrants risks importing to Germany the homicidal anti-Semitism of Muslim extremists who attacked Jewish targets in France, Belgium, Denmark and beyond.

In Monday’s attack, a man described by the Islamic State terrorist group as one if its “soldiers” killed 12 people and wounded 48 by plowing a stolen truck through the Kaiser Wilhelm Memorial Church market. While police hunt for suspects, the attack is likely to further polarise competing views on Muslim immigration in German society in general – especially among Jews who fear they will be among those targeted by Islamists here.

Following the attack, whose perpetrator is presumed to be at large, the top priority is to take on “this army of Muslims from the wildest part of the earth,” said Pavel Feinstein, a member of Berlin’s Jewish community who supports the far-right Alternative for Germany party, whose manifesto from April declares that “Islam is not part of Germany.” AfD, as the party is known, also is accused of being a hotbed for anti-Semites.

Feinstein, 56, told JTA that he came to espouse the AfD view after hearing the slogan “Hamas, Hamas, Jews to the gas” being chanted at an anti-Israel demonstration two years ago in Berlin.

“They weren’t just Islamists, they were also normal Muslims, students and so on,” he recalled. “And no one was charged or punished.

“Up to then I felt at home in Berlin. And now this feeling is gone.”

The hostility expressed by Feinstein, an artist who immigrated to Germany from the former Soviet Union with his family in 1980, may be more common among Russian-speaking Jews, who constitute the largest of the three contingents that make up Germany’s present-day Jewish population of some 200 000. And such views are likely to only harden after the attack, in which one Israeli was wounded. His wife remained missing on Wednesday and was feared to be among the dead.

Feinstein’s sentiment seems less prevalent among Jews who grew up after the Second World War in a society whose youth were taught to reject any semblance of the murderous Nazi xenophobia and anti-Semitism. His rhetoric seems to be even rarer among the 7 500 Israelis living in Berlin, some of whom say they left for Germany partly over what they see as Israel’s rising nationalism.

To be sure, many Russian-speaking Jews, including Sergey Lagodinsky, a Green Party politician and member of the Berlin Jewish Community Council, do not subscribe to Feinstein’s embrace of a far-right vision. Meanwhile, among Jews with deeper roots in Germany, many speak openly and clearly of the risks connected to massive immigration from Arab countries, as do some of Berlin’s Israeli Jews.

Jews of all backgrounds here tend to be “sceptical” of the wisdom of letting in large numbers of Muslims, as has been the policy of German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Lagodinsky said. But Russian-speaking Jews in Germany generally express this “through a more populist way”, including by “engaging with populist parties and ideas”, he added.

Russian speakers of all religions, who make up a large minority of several million people in Germany, are not the only ones showing a proclivity to populism amid what some pundits are calling Germany’s immigration crisis.

On the eve of a big election year in this country, the immigration issue is bolstering AfD, which the mainstream representatives of Jews in Germany reject for the xenophobic and sometimes anti-Semitic rhetoric of some of its members.

While the AfD missed the 5 per cent mark needed to enter parliament in the last federal elections in 2013, polls from before the market attack predicted the party would win 16 per cent of the vote next year. The party currently holds seats in 10 of Germany’s 16 state parliaments, up from five a year ago.

Against this background, terrorist attacks may well cost the centrist Merkel her post and send Germany swinging harder to the right than it has in decades. Her decision in 2015 to allow into Germany 800 000 immigrants from the Middle East has already come under attack even inside her own party amid a string of incidents involving that population – including last summer’s brutal axe attack in Würzburg by a 17-year-old from Afghanistan.

Commenting on the attack, the Berlin director of the American Jewish Committee, Deidre Berger, told JTA that she was worried about the “more than 100 000 unaccompanied minors” among the asylum seekers who “are highly susceptible to the easy answers of radical Islamist ideology.”

Such events have also brought to a head tensions over this issue within the Jewish community, where some members describe the influx of Muslim immigrants as an existential threat.

The Central Council of Jews in Germany, which is the country’s main Jewish umbrella group and has also organised activities to assist Middle Eastern asylum seekers, has warned against a rightward tilt as an answer to the terrorist threat. And Charlotte Knobloch, 84 – a child survivor and head of the Munich and Bavarian Jewish communal organizations – told JTA that the AfD is “totally out of the question for Jewish people”.

On the other hand, in October 2015, the council’s president, Josef Schuster, said in a widely read interview with Die Welt that “there is now fear that with people of Arab origins, anti-Semitism in Germany could increase. I share this concern.” Schuster said the issue should be addressed by emphasising integration initiatives among the newcomers. He also said he supported a magnanimous policy toward asylum seekers, though he added that “eventually” a quota would have to be agreed upon.

But his remarks exposed him to heated criticism by some Israelis In Berlin. Several dozen of them, along with non-Israeli activists, protested Schuster’s remarks at a rally in November 2015 outside the council’s offices, carrying posters of Anne Frank and of the biblical quote “Love Thy Neighbour”.

“I cannot stand by when the president of the Central Council of Jews in Germany assumes a far-right position, supports limiting refugee quotas and instrumentalises anti-Semitism, homophobia and sexism while pretending to speak for ‘the Jews’ in Germany,” wrote Shaked Shapir in Berlin’s Hebrew-language magazine, Spitz, which devoted an entire edition to discussing Schuster’s 2015 remarks.

German officials have been careful not to speculate as to whether the church market attack is connected to radical Islam, as many here believe. The caution appealed to some Israelis in Berlin, who contrasted it with what they regard as a tendency to jump to conclusions in Israel.

“We like the fact that in Berlin it is more calm. They are still investigating, and we will wait,” said Ido Porat, who lives here with his wife and their two small children.

While most Jews in Germany don’t see the influx of migrants from Middle Eastern countries as an invasion, the issue is nonetheless particularly divisive to their communities, according to the German Jewish historian Michael Wolffsohn.

“Every conscious Jew knows or remembers what refugee problems are all about,” he said. “At the same time every conscious Jew knows that many Muslims are more hostile to Jews than, say, Eskimos.”


Also read: 

12 die, 50 injured in Berlin truck carnage

Continue Reading

HOLD Real Estate

Trending