Subscribe to our Newsletter


click to dowload our latest edition

Readers go mad over Darren’s leaving the UOS

Popular UOS exec director Darren Sevitz is leaving after 14 years’ service. This was “in order to maximise efficiencies & improve levels of service delivery to the community”, UOS Chairman Jon Levitt told Jewish Report Online this week. But SAJR users were having none of it! Within 18 hours the story became the third-most-read of all time and our famously rowdy readers have already racked up over 50 chirps in support of Sevitz. So much so, that an embarrassed Sevitz today personally posted a comment asking the community to stop trashing the UOS.

Published

on

Banner

ANT KATZ

The first inclination that anything was amiss beyond rumours at the UOS, was at 21:09 last Thursday on the Kashrut-SA Facebook page, on which Darren Sevitz has built a huge audience, when he posted the following statement: “After having had the privilege and honour to serve as the executive director of the UOS for more than 14 years, I will be leaving the organisation at the end of November.”

UOS 70 – The UOS executive director Darren Sevitz and president Harold Novick in conversation with guest speaker Raymond Ackerman – PIC ILAN OSSENDRYWERSevitz (PICTURED RIGHT) told SAJR on Friday that “because there was a lot of chatter” on the Facebook page, he felt he had to say something.

 “I would like to thank the organisation, its member shuls and our special SA Jewish community for the wonderful years of partnership and support,” he wrote. “I wish the UOS the greatest success with its future endeavours on behalf of the SA Jewish community.”

At the request of Jewish Report on Friday, UOS Chairman Jonathan Levitt prepared a statement over the weekend and SAJR published SEVITZ STRUCTURED OUT IN UOS SHAKE-UP mid-morning Monday.

Within an hour almost 500 people had read the story which went absolutely viral and has now clocked up well over 3 000 reads and over 50 comments – all along the line of #BRINGBACKDARRENSEVITZ!.

Read the story the UOS put out (which clearly enraged Sevitz’s followers), see what he has to say and enjoy the comments. You can even leave your own comments, personally or anonymously. Just don’t trash the UOS, asks Sevitz in his post today.

Read it for yourself, and enjoy the chirps:
SEVITZ STRUCTURED OUT IN UOS SHAKE-UP

Continue Reading
3 Comments

3 Comments

  1. Samuel Shalom

    Nov 13, 2014 at 5:06 am

    Proper English is better than problem English! (Unless it’s coming from the ministry of misinformation of course.)
    \n
    \nOne of the bizarre aspects of this case is the weird and totally incorrect usage of English by the UOS spokesman. One usually encounters mangled syntax and poor grammar coming from foreign countries’ ministries of propaganda when they are trying to convey their own convoluted ways of thinking and expression into English. But it is really hard on the ears and jangles the nerves when a leading organisation and its leaders use a \”wordspeak\” that is so alien that it makes one think what are they trying to hide by using bad language that just sidetracks the mind and makes it difficult to focus on what is really happening?
    \n
    \nJust take a look at this and decide if this would get you through English in high school, never mind getting a distinction:
    \n
    \nFrom \”Sevitz structured out in UOS shake-up\” (bad English for a heading that is derived from the UOS press release.) Is this a new English phrase \”structured out\” and who else has used it? Sounds like maybe it’s \”corporate speak\” perhaps, something that CEOs and CFOs and COOs use, but is \”lost in translation\” for people outside of that world and comes across as terrible English.
    \n


    \n


    \n

    [Hi Samuel, in journalistic terms, headlines and posters, and on websites, teasers, do not always follow “proper English” simply because of space constraints. The idea is to get the message across so that media consumers can easily choose what to buy/read. So, for example, a poster for The Star usually has four words no longer than six letters – and in the case of this website, a headline should have no more than six words to fit the formatting and style. Hence, you will see that all media has limitations on their headlining and. Particularly, on posters     -ED]
    \n


    \n


    \n

    \nThe UOS statement states: \”In order to maximise efficiencies and improve levels of service delivery  to the community, the UOS has embarked on a strategic restructure, which was led by an independent expert consultant.\”
    \n
    \nThere are at least three grammatically incorrect phrases in the above sentence: 1. \”maximise efficiencies\” (how does one \”maximise efficiencies\”? It should have rather said something like \”in order to provide maximum efficiency\” or \”in an effort to be maximally efficient\” but there is NO SUCH THING as \”efficiencies\”!)  2. \”service delivery\” (should be \”delivery of service\” and who uses \”service delivery\” and would an English teacher accept that?) 3. \”a strategic restructure\” (huh? that is not English. This is: \”a strategic restructuring\” and just what is \”a strategic restructure\” is that singular and what tense is that?)
    \n
    \n\”As part of this restructure the executive council and management team decided to replace the position of executive director with two new positions: head of finance and group services, as well as head of kashrut.\”
    \n
    \nAgain, just what is a \”restructure\”? when the correct word is \”restructuring\” and just how many new positions are being created is also not clear, read the ambiguity for yourself. Does \”head of finance and group services, as well as head of kashrut\” mean that there will be: 1.\”head of finance\” + \”group services\” + \”head of kashrut\” (that are three different types of jobs) or 2. \”head of finance and group services\” that are two types of jobs, or 3. \”head of finance and group services\” (that are two job descriptions performed by one person) + \”head of kashrut\”? The bad language only reflects muddled thinking and lack of forethought as to just how important it is to be clear especially when the public is SHOCKED and is demanding CLARIFICATION.
    \n
    \n\”Darren Sevitz has served with dedication as executive director for the past 14 years and although he was offered a senior position in the new structure, he decided instead to leave the organisation in order to pursue new opportunities.\”
    \n
    \nWhat is this supposed to mean: \”he was offered a senior position in the new structure\”? What is this supposed \”new structure\”? A statue? A building? Because that is what  a \”structure\” is, it refers to a, well, a structure, but not an organisation in this context where the correct wording should have been \”with the restructuring of the organisation he was offered a senior position in it\” [or \”in the organisation\”] or if you must, \”he was offered a new position in the restructured organisation\” but NOT \”in the new structure\” that is incorrect syntax and bad grammar.
    \n
    \n\”We are confident that the restructure will significantly enhance the operational capabilities of the UOS and its service to the South African Jewish community.\”
    \n
    \nAgain that horrible phrase: \”We are confident that the restructure\” that grates on the ears. Why couldn’t it say correctly that \”We are confident that the restructuring…\” that would not jump out at you as if someone is mangling the English language and creating jangled and jarring sounds that just reflects the dissonance of the whole upsetting situation.’

  2. Curious

    Nov 13, 2014 at 7:20 am

    ‘Darren is right that it is wrong to make this issue personal or to demonise anybody, as this tends to divert attention from the real issues.

    Having read most of the comments through the various social media and Chai FM, it seems that a number of issues/allegations are being made against the UOS, Beth Din and Chief Rabbi, which will be listed below.

    I think that in order to clear the air, the UOS, Beth Din and Chief Rabbi owe the community a comprehensive and honest response to all of them. At the end of the day they serve us!

    The community wants to know:

    a) Why exactly was Darren let go? Please do not insult our collective intelligence with nonsense about restructuring.

    b) If Darren was paid to leave, how much and where is  the money coming from?

    c) Did the Chief Rabbi usurp power and \”hijack\” control of the UOS? If so, was this in line with the constitution of the UOS? If not what is Mr. Levitt,  the chairman of the UOS and as such responsible for the governance of the UOS, doing about it? And for that matter, how did he allow it? Was he complicit in it?

    d) Is there a campaign under way to install the Chief Rabbi as the Head of the Beth Din after Rabbi Kurtstag retires?

    e) Are more people going to be \”restructured\” out? If so, who and why?

    f) Is it appropriate to have one person having unfettered control of the community?

    The sooner these issues are brought into the open and debated, the sooner we can go back to what we should be doing, namely being a model of unity and tolerance.’

  3. Samuel Shalom

    Nov 13, 2014 at 8:33 am

    ‘Re @Curious 13 Nov

    An important question also needs to be, that how is it that coming on the heels of the much touted and hyped Shabbos Project why is this new \”restructure\” [sic] happening now?

    When two major events such as the Shabbos Project that is tied in with the Chief Rabbi who is connected with the UOS happens almost at the same time as the departure/ouster of Sevitz at the UOS there has to be a connection.

    Just looking at the scope and sophistication of the Shabbos Project it OBVIOUSLY involves the backing of millions of Rands if one tallies up the global efforts, yet no one knows who is giving the money and the amounts involved, then we are talking big money mysteriously flowing in to the Chief Rabbi’s coffers, and of course it does not go personally to him but nevertheless flows from donors/organisations/philanthropy to organisation/recipient institution/Chief Rabbi’s office/UOS/Beth Din. In this case either the \”Office of the Chief Rabbi\” which is supposedly a subsidiary of the UOS just as the Beth Din is an affiliate of the UOS.

    There needs to be ACCOUNTABILITY and most of all TRANSPARENCY as in any major financial operation that involves public charity and communal funds, in this case also coming in from overseas to fund the Shabbos Project and with that infusing the office of Chief Rabbi and the UOS with new found financial backing that is now under the spotlight.

    Any shull or corporation would have to \”open its books\” at frequent intervals and in some cases this information should and is public knowledge because it is based on the donations from the public not to mention its good will.

    Not too long ago the King David Schools Foundation (KDSF) in Johannesburg hired forensic accountants to review its cash flow and donations going back decades and discovered to its horror that literally millions of Rands had been mysteriously and quietly siphoned off and that the KDSF had been defrauded by one of its own employees due to INSUFFICIENT scrutiny and oversight as one of its own \”trusted\” employees had been defrauding it even as outside and local donors thought that their money was going to genuine Tzedaka to help the pupils when instead it was going into the pockets of a corrupt employee. This scandal was in fact eventually settled, with the Chief Rabbi’s involvement, by the Beth Din itself that imposed financial penalties and communal service on the guilty parties. This example amply proves the need for OVERSIGHT, TRANSPARENCY and TRUST at the UOS & at the Chief Rabbi’s Office & at the Beth Din that is now in question given the arbitrary nature of the recent moves to oust a high level employee to date deemed fully trustworthy and very reliable not to mention highly efficient, extremely popular and amazingly successful at his tough job at the Byzantine UOS and now he is suddenly gone leaving behind more perplexing questions than any satisfying answers, just useless platitudes that’s justifiably leaving the public confused, angry and disillusioned.’

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Banner

“Let my people in” – chief rabbi takes on travel ban

Published

on

South Africa’s chief rabbi, Dr Warren Goldstein, has taken on the Israeli government over its sudden blanket travel ban in light of the new variant discovered by South African scientists.

He has been interviewed in Hebrew across multiple national radio stations, TV stations, print media, and online media in Israel.

In a plea to Israeli leaders, he said that shutting the door on world Jewry was a mistake for a number of reasons.

Many South African Jews were turned back in transit between 25 and 26 November, and others are desperately trying to get there because of important family commitments. But the chief rabbi emphasises that “Israel is home to all Jews, especially in times of crisis, and a total closure signals a separation between Israeli and diaspora Jews. The new variant doesn’t distinguish between Jews who have Israeli citizenship and other Jews.”

To him, there are two issues at stake. “The first is the relationship between Israel and the South African Jewish community. Our relationship with Israel is very much part of our value system, and we are a very Zionist community. This is expressed in many different ways, for example, our aliyah numbers, which proportionately are really strong. It’s also expressed in the high percentage of our community who have visited Israel, the fact that so many of our youth study in Israel, and especially in how so many of us have family in Israel. The connection goes very deep.”

To be blocked from entering Israel is therefore “a real blow to the South African Jewish community – spiritually and emotionally”. This latest blanket ban comes after almost two years of very intermittent access to Israel, and the new extreme levels of restriction were a tipping point for him.

“I felt I needed to make my voice heard in Israeli society. This is why I went to the Hebrew media, so that this plea would be heard by society and decision makers. I wanted to send a message on behalf of our whole community.”

He says he has seen the pain of these restrictions reflected in many ways. For example, specific incidents, like a father not being able to attend his son’s Barmitzvah, and a general sense of loss and distance.

The other reason he has spoken out is “for the sake of Israel itself, and for all Jews. Is Israel an ordinary state, or a Jewish state?” he asks rhetorically. “This is a direct plea to the Israeli government and goes to the heart of Israel’s identity. Israel is the only Jewish state, and we are deeply connected to it. In light of that unbreakable bond, if the state says some Jews can’t enter, it’s drawing a divide between the state of Israel and communities across the diaspora. That partnership between diaspora Jewry and the state of Israel is crucial, and if you break that bond, it will hurt Israel and world Jewry.”

He isn’t asking Israel to jeopardise the health of its citizens. Rather, he’s asking that the same criteria be applied to Israeli citizens returning to Israel and Jews needing to visit. Israeli citizens who want to return are allowed to do so if they are fully vaccinated, do a PCR test, and go into quarantine.

“If you combine these three strict requirements, the Israeli authorities have deemed that the risk becomes negligible. If they are good enough for Israeli citizens, any Jew in the world should be allowed to enter on the same basis.”

Goldstein is speaking up now in particular because “vaccines have completely transformed the risk profile. We can see this in the current wave in South Africa.” He has written about it before, but not as extensively as now. “I’ve learnt that one needs to use multiple platforms and address Israeli society directly.”

He says the message has found “tremendous resonance with journalists. I haven’t spoken to one Israeli interviewer who wasn’t sympathetic. They have challenged me, and I have clarified that I’m not asking for more than what’s granted to Israeli citizens. There has been a lot of support and interest.”

He says the incident in which South African Jews were forced away from Israel on Friday 26 November and made to fly on Shabbat was “an absolute disgrace and totally unacceptable for any state, but for a Jewish state, was unthinkable and beyond the pale. This is especially considering the circumstances of two of these Jews going to comfort the Kay family, whose son gave his life for the state of Israel. At the very least, the Israeli government must apologise for this conduct and promise its citizens and Jews around the world that such a thing will never happen again.”

Finally, he says “vaccination is everything. It’s a blessing. Thank G-d for it. Take it with both hands: it is a big mitzvah to protect yourself and others.”

Continue Reading

Banner

World mourns Eli Kay, son of SA Jewry

Published

on

At the beginning of November, the Kay family celebrated the happiest of simchas in Israel – the wedding of Avi and Devorah Kay’s eldest son. Three weeks later, they again gathered in the Jewish homeland, but this time for the darkest of tragedies: the funeral of the Kays’ second eldest son, Eliyahu (Eli), who was murdered by a Hamas terrorist in Jerusalem on Sunday, 21 November 2021.

A South African oleh who was building a beautiful life in Israel, 25-year-old Kay was shot dead by a Palestinian gunman in Old City, near the Kotel. Four others were hurt. Horrific images of blood being washed from the Jerusalem stones were seen online after the attack.

The Jewish world is now mourning the senseless loss of a soul who embodied the best of the South African Jewish community and its commitment to Judaism and Israel. Indeed, that deep love of his faith, history, and identity was what brought Kay to the Kotel on Sunday. He was living his purpose but was killed for being a Jew.

An ardent Zionist, he made aliyah from South Africa without his family in 2016. His parents and siblings later joined him, with his parents leaving South Africa last December amidst tough COVID-19 restrictions. They settled in Modi’in. Avi’s parents, Cliffy and Jessie, remain in Johannesburg, while Devorah’s parents Rabbi Shlomo and Rebbetzin Lynndy Levin of South Hampstead Synagogue, live in London. The tragedy of grandparents burying a grandchild is unfathomable.

The family are pillars of the Johannesburg Jewish community, and played a vital role in building Torah Academy over generations. Both parents, as well as their four children, were alumni of the school. In its statement, the school pointed out that Kay was killed while holding his tefillin and a Likutei Sichos [The ‘Collected Talks’ containing the teachings of the Lubavitcher Rebbe] – devoted until the very end to his Judaism.

He accomplished much in his short life. After arriving in Israel, he studied at a Chabad yeshiva in Kiryat Gat in the south of Israel, and then enlisted in the army. “He was a squad commander in the paratroopers, which is a big deal for a lone soldier in my view,” says Ron Feingold, who served with him. “He volunteered for the IDF [Israel Defense Forces] and then excelled enough to lead people in it. I will never forget our conversations about the duty that we felt to our people.”

After completing his military service, he volunteered at the Nirim kibbutz for a year in the Eshkol region of Israel. Writing on Facebook, Shira Silkoff recalled meeting him when she arrived on kibbutz.

“The first time I met you [Eli], you were walking in one direction and I was walking the other. I was shy, unsure of how to go about meeting people who already all seemed to be friends. But we spoke for a few minutes, on that kibbutz path, with you holding a tub of slowly melting ice cream. Because that was you. You had time for everyone. No news report can capture your spirit. Your smile. Your passion for life, your ability to hold deep conversations at absurd hours, and absurd conversations at any hour. None of the news reports can capture your enthusiasm, your determination to achieve everything you set out to do.”

Kay then began working at the Kotel as a guide at the Western Wall Plaza. Some reported that he was murdered on his way to pray, others that it was on his way to work. But for Kay, these tasks were intricately connected. At the end of the day, he was there because he loved Israel and the Jewish people. According to The Western Wall Heritage Foundation, Kay “warmly greet[ed] everyone he met, doing his sacred work”.

Hearing the news was one of the most difficult moments for members of the South African Jewish community. “I was broken, gutted,” says Rabbi Levi Avtzon, who taught Kay when he was a teen. “Eli was quite a character: he was feisty and demanded a lot of himself and others. He didn’t have time for nonsense. He was a great guitar player and a natural leader. He was a searcher, looking for the truth. And when he saw the truth, he would go all the way in following it.”

Avtzon says these values came from the incredible upbringing he received from his parents. He describes Avi as “a gentle soul” and “an incredible financial advisor”, who continues to do this work in South Africa even though he now lives in Israel. “Until they left for Israel, Devorah was the life and soul of Torah Academy Girls High – loved by everyone and really dynamic.” The family’s door was always open. For example, they graciously hosted Avtzon’s parents when they visited him after he first moved to South Africa as his flat was too small.

Contemplating what Kay’s future would have looked like had his life not been stolen so senselessly, Avtzon says, “No matter what he would have done, he would have done it well. We need to take pride that this is the kind of mensch that our community raises.”

Kay’s cousin, Eli Landes, wrote on Facebook how he remembered “dancing with you [Eli], laughing with you, learning to play ‘mouth trumpet’ with you, studying with you, making up fake British sentences with you, talking about life with you. In life, you defended us. Guarded us. And now, I have no doubt you stand at G-d’s right hand, continuing to fight for us and protect us.”

Kay’s fiancé, Jen Schiff, said, “I felt it was important to share how much Eli loved this country, and how he came here by himself, and fought for this country. He always treated everyone with love and respect. And I know that when this happened, he didn’t feel alone.”

The outpouring of grief and support came from the very top of Israeli society as well as from around the globe. Prime Minister Naftali Bennett, former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Foreign Affairs Minister Yair Lapid and other Israeli leaders expressed condolences. Minister of diaspora affairs, Nachman Shai, personally wrote to the South African Jewish community, saying, “My heart breaks with yours. [Eli] was a son of both of our communities … Eli represented the best of the Zionist spirit nurtured in Johannesburg.”

Shai represented the Israeli government at the funeral, which took place at Har Menuchot cemetery in Jerusalem. Thousands of people from all walks of life attended in person, and almost 2 600 people (mostly from South Africa) watched on YouTube. There, Shai described him as “the paratrooper, the yeshiva student, warrior … the best of the best”.

Kay “would have been a great husband and father”, said an emotional Rabbi Motti Hadar, the principal of Torah Academy Boys High School, contemplating the brightest of futures cut short. “That is the hugest tragedy. And while his time came too soon, I think there is almost no other way he would have chosen to go than literally sacrificing his life for what he believed in, which was Israel, his Judaism, and living life to the fullest.”

Continue Reading

Banner

Miss SA future uncertain as Israel hatred boils

Published

on

It’s touch and go whether Miss South Africa will get on a plane to Israel to compete in the Miss Universe pageant next month, after a week of high drama in which the South African government bizarrely withdrew its support for the young university graduate.

The government had the anti-Israel lobby licking its lips at the prospect of her dreams being crushed. This lobby was determined that Lalela Mswane would never compete on an international stage in the coastal town of Eilat.

There are many who want her to go to Israel and represent her country, learn, engage, and prosper and there are those – a bunch of Israel haters – who are pulling out every stop to prevent it.

So far, the 24-year-old KwaZulu-Natal beauty has stood her ground. She is due to meet about 70 of her counterparts from all over the world – including the Arab world – in the Holy Land in a few weeks’ time.

Just how long she, the private Miss South Africa Organisation, and its chief executive, Stephanie Weil, can withstand the heat created by the small but predatory anti-Israel lobby is anyone’s guess.

At the time of going to press the odds were stacked against them in a fast moving developing story that has everyone guessing.

“It’s a rollercoaster ride,” said one insider.

Behind the scenes, a myriad of supporters have rallied around the young beauty queen, desperate to help her as critics stop at nothing to prevent her from representing her country at the Olympic Games of beauty pageants.

“It’s precarious, complicated,” offered another.

There has been more time and space allocated to this issue in the media than FW de Klerk’s death and his funeral arrangements, hung local councils, and coalition talks. Never mind the country’s dire electricity crisis, abysmal unemployment rate, water cuts, and critical crime levels. Social media has been lit with those fiercely in favour and those vehemently against Mswane attending the pageant.

It appears from thousands of social-media posts that many more are in favour of her fulfilling her dreams and wish her well than not.

The drama started with a statement issued on Sunday, 15 November, by the department of sports, art, and culture announcing that it would no longer support the pageant because of Miss SA organiser’s “intransigence and disregard” of advice against sending Miss SA to Israel, which it said would have a negative impact on her reputation and future.

The ministry, headed by Nathi Mthethwa, has come under fire for its lack of compassion for struggling artists during COVID-19 and the minister’s general ineffectiveness together with his department’s mismanagement of funds.

The African National Congress (ANC) made its views clear by backing and welcoming the government’s decision to withdraw support for Mswane.

The Democratic Alliance’s deputy shadow minister of sports, art, and culture, Veronica van Dyk, told the SA Jewish Report, “Miss SA is a private company, and as such must deal with the government as it sees fit. We don’t intend to be drawn into a fight between the two. A beauty pageant should never be politicised, and this is exactly what the ANC is trying to achieve. We should be weary not to fall into their trap.”

Department of international relations and cooperation (Dirco) spokesperson, Clayson Monyela, said this week that in spite of all of the anti-Israel rhetoric, South Africa had “no intention of suspending any diplomatic relationships with Israel”.

He told The Citizen, and later repeated to the SA Jewish Report that Mthethwa’s announcement reflected the government’s stance on the matter falling under his portfolio, “but didn’t indicate any intentions of cutting ties with Israel”.

“We have diplomatic relations with both Israel and Palestine. What has happened with Miss South Africa cannot be anywhere close to cutting diplomatic ties. We can’t do that because if we do that, it means we can’t engage with Israel so are excluding ourselves from being part of the solution to the conflict, because if you cut ties with a country, it doesn’t have to engage with you,” said Monyela.

However Miss SA’s future hangs in the balance, as negotiations behind the scenes continue ad nauseam.

Zev Krengel, the national vice-president of the South African Jewish Board of Deputies, lambasted the anti-Israel lobby for its bullying and intimidatory tactics, and said Miss SA was being used as a political scapegoat.

“Miss SA is a young woman, she is an easy target,” he said.

South Africa, he said, participated in various team sports, namely baseball, tennis, and soccer, against Israel, and where was the outrage?

Speculation has it that the signing of the Abraham Accords could eventually lead to Israel co-hosting the 2030 FIFA World Cup with its Arab neighbours.

“Do you see South Africa pulling Bafana Bafana out? No, this is pure bullying of a young woman, it’s outrageous,” he said.

He said he was bitterly disappointed in the government for withdrawing its support of Miss SA saying it was “on the wrong side of history, and while the rest of the world opens up and benefits from relations with Israel, including several Arab nations, South Africa is determined to remain on the sidelines of progress”.

People from all over have weighed in on the controversy.

The former Israeli ambassador to South Africa, Arthur Lenk, tweeted, “Wait, wait! Governments offer no support for this non-governmental contest. And the SA government made no decision whatsoever. A single ministry stated a viewpoint. Where is the story here other than the hateful noise the anti-Israel lobby is peddling?”

Author Khaya Dlanga took to Instagram saying that the government had “crossed the line” by withdrawing its support for Mswane, and had thrown her under the bus.

“They have put a young woman in an impossible position,” he said. “This government hasn’t imposed sanctions against Israel or travel restrictions. Instead, it’s grandstanding on the shoulders of a young girl. Why throw her under the bus when it hasn’t made meaningful commitments? Let her go.”

The South African Zionist Federation (SAZF) said it was “appalled” that the government was “self-sabotaging” the country’s hopes and chances of participating and shining in Miss Universe just because it happened to take place in Israel.

“Our country is simply signalling its isolationism and irrelevance on the world stage,” it said.

The government had been silent on serious human-rights abuses occurring in many other countries where South Africa participates in sports and contests but “self-righteously reserves its opprobrium for the world’s only Jewish state”, the SAZF said.

“If our country were interested in bringing peace to the Middle East or carrying any moral weight in playing a mediatory role between Israel and the Palestinians, we have now ensured that our one-sidedness and unilateralism will prevent us from doing so,” the organisation said.

Meanwhile, the Miss South Africa Organisation broke its social-media silence this week with an Instagram post about Miss SA 2020, Shudufhadzo Musida’s, participation at Miss World in Puerto Rico on 16 December.

While Miss SA seemingly had the world at her feet just weeks ago, it remains to be seen if she will participate in Miss Universe.

Continue Reading

HOLD Real Estate: Here is what you need to know about getting a mortgage in Israel. Read the full article here:

Trending