Israel on a knife edge before elections
The most common question I’ve been asked this week is why the Iron Dome missile defence system didn’t shoot down the rocket fired at central Israel on Monday.
The answer is that there was no Iron Dome system deployed there. Perhaps few people realise this, but there are only ten Iron Dome batteries in the country, meaning that not all of Israel’s airspace is protected. The system is hugely expensive, and each time a missile is fired – and usually two are – at an incoming rocket, it costs more than $50 000 (R723 411) per launch. (By comparison each Hamas rocket costs around $500 (R7,185) to $1 000 (R14,370) to produce). For all its impressiveness, Israel’s security is not totally fool proof.
At the time of writing, there’s an uneasiness in the country. Reserve soldiers have been called up, and tanks are in position along the Gaza border. For the first time since Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced a snap vote next month, questions are being asked if those elections will indeed take place.
It’s in Netanyahu’s interest that they do. Timing is everything in politics, and a war in Gaza two weeks before Israelis head to the polls won’t win him any votes. However, should the prime minister feel he has no choice but to respond harshly to what are clearly Palestinian provocations from Gaza, the country could find itself embroiled in a war rather than in the midst of parliamentary elections.
In this respect, the timing could not be worse for Netanyahu. Not only was he in the United States when the situation with Gaza flared up, but his meeting with American President Donald Trump was overshadowed by events back home. Instead of congratulating him over Trump’s public recognition of Israeli sovereignty of the Golan Heights, most Israelis were preparing their bomb shelters.
Of course they were excited by the recognition, but practically-speaking, most Israelis realise it won’t make any difference on the ground. Already Britain, France, Russia, and China – the remaining five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council, all of whom hold veto power – have said they will continue to consider the area “occupied territory” in line with international law.
Jerusalem could also be shooting herself in the foot further down the line.
Palestinians already dismiss Washington as a neutral broker, and it seems hard to imagine how this latest move will endear them further to the White House’s long-awaited peace plan, whenever it is released. As for Syria, there seems no incentive now for Damascus to create peace with Israel, although to be fair, the civil war has made that a distant priority.
Trump’s proclamation also opens up a can of worms. From the standpoint of international law, the capture of the Golan Heights is no different from that of the West Bank. This means that for Netanyahu’s right-wing support base, the logical next step is to demand the annexation of Judea and Samaria, and perhaps Gaza.
It’s worth pointing out that previous Israeli governments, from the left and right, have rejected this because of the large Palestinian populations in those areas. It also sets a precedent for recognising other territories like Russia’s recent takeover of Crimea, which the United States has said it will never recognise.
But US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo doesn’t think so. He insists that the Golan recognition is unique because in 1967, Israel was defending herself from external threats. It’s a murky argument.
The last time there was such a dramatic statement by Trump regarding Israel was when he recognised Jerusalem as the country’s capital, and subsequently moved his embassy there from Tel Aviv. But unlike the mass violence that accompanied that move ten months ago, this time there were no protests along the Israel-Syria border. Both Trump and Netanyahu knew there wouldn’t be.
About 22 000 Druze – an Arab minority who practice an offshoot of Islam – live on the Israeli side of the Golan Heights. Many have relatives living across the border on the Syrian side. Publicly these “Israeli Druze” consider themselves Syrian, and have rejected Israeli citizenship, but it’s believed (by most Israelis) that in private they’d rather be part of Israel instead of Syria. Be that as it may, they did not take to the streets in anger and neither did others in the international community aside from the to-be-expected condemnations.
Damascus called Trump’s proclamation a “blatant attack” on its sovereignty. There was direct and implied criticism from European and Middle Eastern countries, but nothing more. Syria is in disarray, and so the timing is most opportune for Trump to make such a statement and for the international community, unlike with the embassy move, to remain inactive over it.
The American president is clearly helping Netanyahu in his election fight, and the Israeli premier is making the most of it. Netanyahu has repeatedly stressed that it was on his clock that the US embassy was moved to Jerusalem and, now, that Israeli sovereignty of the Golan Heights was recognised. Trump has even appeared alongside him in an election-campaign poster that has the two leaders shaking hands above the slogan “Netanyahu, in a different league.”
Earlier this month, Trump went so far as to boast that if he was to run in the Israeli elections, he would poll at 98%. He wasn’t far off. His popularity inside Israel has jumped from 56% two years ago to 69% today, and climbing. His friendship with Netanyahu is a major plus for the prime minister.
Still, Trump’s gestures of unconditional support for Israel are less about Israelis and Zionist Jews and more about American evangelicals who he hopes will help him win him re-election in 2020.
Jews make up only 2% to 3% of the American electorate. Evangelical Christians make up 25% of the US population.
Trump’s Republican Party is purposefully creating the impression that Jews are leaving the Democratic camp that they’ve traditionally supported for the Republicans. The term “Jexodus” has even been coined. But while this might be happening, it’s on a smaller scale than Washington would have us believe.
And yet, everything could change in the blink of an eye. Netanyahu’s fate come 9 April is still undecided. A war with Gaza or a rocket attack that kills Israelis (unlike the two this month that fortunately had no fatalities) could tip the scales.
The murder of Ashley Kriel
Forensic investigator David Klatzow, who for three decades campaigned to reopen the investigation into the death of anti-apartheid activist Ashley Kriel in 1987, welcomes the news that the case is being reinvestigated. He gives his opinion.
There were many crimes committed by the police in the 1980s which cry out for justice. Some made it into the headlines, but none resulted in the prosecution of the policemen who committed these crimes. Not even in the case of Steve Biko were the police sanctioned for his death. It took years to get Biko’s doctors Benjamin Tucker and Ivor Lang to be censured by the deeply apartheid medical council.
The case of Ashley Kriel is no exception to this toxic and melancholy state of affairs. Ashley was an effective political organiser in the Cape, and his activities brought him to the attention of the security police. He was a wanted man.
One day in 1987, the police received information that Kriel was hiding in a house in Athlone, and they sent Sergeant Anthony Abels and Warrant Officer Jeff Benzien to survey the house, but not to take any further action. Disobeying their orders, they knocked at the door, and when Kriel opened it, a struggle allegedly ensued.
During that struggle, according to the police, Kriel produced a firearm and, in the process of subduing him, a shot was discharged and Kriel was fatally wounded. So much for the police version.
I gave evidence at the inquest. On the bench was inquest Magistrate G Hoffman and sitting as an assessor was Theo Schwër, who was the head of forensic medicine at Stellenbosch.
Crucial to the case was the fact that there appeared to be a contact wound on Ashley’s back just alongside his shoulder blade. However, there was also a hole in the tracksuit top he was wearing. Herein lay the problem. The hole in the clothing was small, about three millimetres. Tests done by me with the same weapon and the same type of clothing using a dead pig as a backdrop, produced a significantly larger hole, about 30 millimetres in size.
Thus, the hole in the clothing didn’t match up with the alleged contact shot that was central to the police version. The police brought in their ballistics “expert”, one Willie Visser, who essentially found that a contact shot with pig skin as a backdrop produced the massive hole. This was no problem for Visser. He went about manipulating his results until, by using a sandbag as a backdrop, he could achieve the size hole in the clothing that he desired.
My comment to the court was that the only thing that this proved was that the deceased was a sandbag – the so-called reductio ad absurdum argument (a method to disprove an argument by illustrating how it leads to absurd consequences). The state pathologist, the late Deon Knobel, was no better. He performed equally fatuous and scientifically illiterate experiments to prove the police version.
What actually happened was that Kriel was shot from some distance away and Benzien, realising that this would be difficult to explain, pulled up Kriel’s tracksuit top and fired a second shot through the same entrance wound. This is the only explanation which can explain the discrepancy in the bullet-hole size in the tracksuit.
Of great sadness to me was the assessor. He should have known better. He sat through this parade of scientific nonsense without raising a question.
The failure to act fairly and to see to it that justice was administered will stand for evermore against the name of Theo Schwër, and rightly so. The magistrate, Hoffman, was typical of the apartheid apparatchiks who were all too common on the bench at the time.
Thus, the take-home message of this whole parody of an inquest was that Ashley Kriel was murdered by Benzien and Abel, and the justice system let him down.
The application by Benzien at the amnesty hearings of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission was similarly a travesty as far as the truth was concerned. The person who represented the family never thought to properly prepare any cross examination for Benzien.
The result was that Benzien continued with his false narrative, and got away with it again. That lawyer now inhabits the Cape Bench.
The climate of our courts has changed, and the re-opening if the Ahmed Timol inquest and the inquest into the death of Dr Neil Aggett have set the scene for more investigation to find the truth and punish the wrongdoers. It would be a good example to set for the current crew of corrupt policemen.
- David Klatzow was one of South Africa’s first private forensic scientists and was involved in most of the high profile cases of the 80s and early 90s, including the Helderberg plane crash, the attempted murder of Dr Frank Chikane and the murder of the Gugulethu 7.
The artist, the ConCourt judge, and RBG
The last time retired Constitutional Court Judge Albie Sachs saw his dear friend, United States (US) Supreme Court Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg was when he delivered a unique lace collar created by acclaimed South African artist Kim Lieberman at the end of 2018.
Bader Ginsburg died, aged 87, on 18 September after a long illness, and the world is mourning this political and feminist icon. Since she became the second woman ever to serve on the US Supreme Court in 1993, RBG (as she was affectionately called) has been a leading voice for gender equality, women’s interests, civil rights, and liberties.
Lieberman learnt about RBG in July 2018 and was taken with all that she stood for. Once she realised that the US judge collected and wore lace collars, she was determined to make one for her.
Lieberman described RBG as having challenged and transformed gender-based laws and perceptions for decades. “She must have been pivotal at the start of the feminist era,” said Lieberman “She continued to press issues of that nature. People celebrate her integrity and her stance, and what must be the dignified yet fierce way she had to uphold and place her value system.”
Lieberman contacted Sachs as soon as she could because she knew he was a close friend of RBG.
“I emailed him [in August 2018] about my idea, asking him if he had a route to get the lace collar to her. He said he would gladly take it to her himself if I could make it by November, as he was going to Washington DC then,” said Lieberman. She made it and delivered it to Sachs in Cape Town, and he personally took it to the already ailing US judge.
Sachs had been friends with RBG for about 20 years at the time, having met her at the US Supreme Court when gathering ideas for building the Constitutional Court in South Africa. After being introduced to her and invited to her chambers, visiting her became a “must-do” whenever he was in Washington DC.
RBG and her late husband, Marty, then came to visit Sachs in South Africa to see the Constitutional Court about 10 to 15 years ago. “She adored our court, loving the warmth and friendliness of the building,” he said. Her delight in the court Sachs was so involved in developing was his all-time favourite memory of her.
Because of him, RBG went on to write the foreword for Art and Justice, a book on the art collection of the Constitutional Court of South Africa. It turns out that an artwork of Lieberman was featured in the book.
When Sachs took Lieberman’s collar to RBG, he recalls having to wait a while to see her because, in spite of her ailing health, she was working out with her trainer. He smiles at the memory of how RBG “looked like this tiny person who would be blown away by the wind, but she had a vice-like grip and was incredibly strong”.
He recalls her opening the box with the collar in it, and her eyes lighting up. “She gasped, literally gasped. She said she was thrilled, and felt and touched the collar, and put it back on the soft, dark cushion and said, ‘Albie, I can’t wear this, it’s a work of art. I’m going to rather frame it’.”
Sachs told the SA Jewish Report this week, “Ruth was very careful that we shouldn’t take photographs of her wearing the lace collar as she didn’t want her station to be involved in anything commercial as in to promote Kim’s work.”
However, he said he was “so happy” to take the collar to RBG because he knew that Lieberman had created it for her out of deep respect for all she stood for. Also, he said, it was no coincidence that Lieberman was working in lace, and RBG was interested in lace collars. It made sense to him that she would want to give her this gift.
For Lieberman, the mission that connected her to RBG began in a mud bath on the Italian island of Vulcano. “I was chatting to an American woman I’d just met, and I mentioned that I make conceptual art and lace,” recalled Lieberman. “She asked if I’d heard of Judge Ginsburg. She told me that she wears lace collars to make political, feminist statements. You can just imagine the shivers I had. So many of the concepts she spoke of I embed in my lace works. I knew I had to make RBG a lace collar. I immediately also knew how it would look, and the concepts it would convey – the same concepts with which she imbues her own collars.”
Early on as a judge, RBG decided that as her male counterparts wore ties, she would wear feminine collars as a feminist stand. But feminism was only one part of this complex and fascinating woman, who also loved art and opera.
Sachs described his late friend as “very solid, grounded, firm, and decent” about being a judge, a woman, and a dear friend. “She had an extremely sharp mind, quick but not witty and smartassed – that wasn’t her style.
“She had a deep and profound sense of justice, being there to protect the vulnerable. So, although she became famous as a feminist legal advocate and strategist, which was central to her work, it didn’t stop her from engaging in other areas where people were being unfairly treated by the law.”
RBG recognised that people thought she offered a different vision of the world to that of Donald Trump, Sachs said. However, she “lacked bravado, and instead was thoughtful and modest and very determined to do what was right”.
September 11 indelibly imprinted in our minds
Greg Baron will never forget 19 years ago looking up after being evacuated from his hotel room in the World Trade Center complex in New York and seeing people jumping from the North Tower.
“They kept telling us not to look up, but of course we did just that,” said this Sandton resident who survived the horrific 11 September 2001 terrorist attack. “We could see people jumping from the North Tower. We heard another noise and watched as the second plane hit the building. I knew we had to get out of there as fast as possible.”
So many years later, this memory is still indelibly imprinted on this Sandton resident’s memory because he and his sister Elise survived this terrible tragedy in which 2 977 people lost their lives.
Like so many others who lived to tell the story of the collapse of New York’s iconic World Trade Center, he still asks himself why he emerged from the disaster in which terrorists forced American pilots to fly into the twin towers of the World Trade Center.
This Friday marks the sombre anniversary of one of the greatest tragedies of the past two decades.
“I can still see that destruction, the plane hitting the building and solid structures disappearing in a few moments in front of my eyes,” says Baron. “I don’t think people actually comprehend the extent of what happened, the damage which was actually done and how lucky some of us are to still be here.”
Baron was visiting New York with his sister in September 2001, following their stay in Chicago where they had celebrated the wedding of their brother. The two flew to New York on 10 September, looking forward to spending a few days in the ‘Big Apple’ before returning to South Africa.
“A friend was working in the city and invited us to stay at the World Trade Center’s Marriott Hotel where he had accommodation. We took rooms on the 15th floor,” he says.
Baron and his sister spent the evening of 10 September out on the town, returning late to their hotel room. They were awoken the following morning by vibrations felt across the room and the sound of the hotel alarm system at 08:45.
“Initially, we were told to stay in our rooms,” Baron recalls. “We looked outside and noticed that the windows were cracking. I called reception, but they insisted we stay put. Suddenly, we were told to get out as fast as possible and evacuate the building.
“We ran down those flights of stairs. When we arrived at the lobby, I remember a woman still in her nightgown and hair curlers saying that she’d seen a body bounce off her room window. We were stunned.”
The lobby was soon evacuated, and guests ushered quickly outdoors where dozens of police cars and fire engines were arriving.
Baron navigated to the nearby Battery Park, located at the southern tip of Manhattan about 1½ kilometres from the site of the disaster.
“We sat at the edge of the water, and I thought that if things got really bad, we could jump in and swim towards Ellis Island,” he says. “I could see the building from where we sat for a moment, but suddenly it just vanished behind other buildings.”
The two were soon blanketed in thick dust from the collapsed building, while overhead American fighter jets roared towards the scene. Unable to contact anyone, they boarded a ferry for Staten Island and managed to make for New Jersey before heading back to New York.
After a grim week in the city, they boarded the second international flight out of New York and travelled back home to South Africa, escorted by fighter jets until they were clear of American airspace.
“I didn’t often think about what happened until recently,” Baron says. “I compartmentalised the event in the back of my brain. I don’t know why I’m still here today.”
Tragically, others from our community lost their lives in the events of that day. One is Zambian-born Edmund Glazer, a graduate of King David Linksfield who had moved to America after completing his schooling. An accomplished accountant, husband, and father, he lived in Boston with his family.
“Edmund was flying to Los Angeles on the day of 9/11,” recounts his sister, Beatrice Carter, from her home in North Carolina, USA. “He flew all over the world for his job. His wife insisted he not fly to Israel at the time because it was dangerous, but tragedy ended up happening in his own backyard. Nobody saw it coming.”
Glazer was aboard American Airlines flight 11 which was hijacked 15 minutes after take-off and flown into the North Tower at 08:46 local time. The flight manifest later showed that he was seated beside Daniel Levin, an American Israeli mathematician who was murdered when he tried to overcome the terrorists.
She continues: “Edmund always flew out on the first flight of the day, and always called me and his wife before take-off and after landing. That morning, he didn’t call me. I watched what was happening in New York, contacted his wife, and said I refused to believe it.
“As the day went on, I got the feeling that something had happened to him. Later, the FBI visited her home and confirmed that Edmund had died.”
It fell to Carter to notify her parents in Toronto, so she drove to their home and broke the difficult news in person. After spending time with them, she headed to Boston to be with her sister-in-law and four-year-old nephew. A memorial was arranged for Glazer and, although Carter anticipated a maximum of 50 people, some 500 attended the ceremony.
“He was so loved and respected within his industry,” she says. “Nobody called him an acquaintance – he was always a friend. My brother had a way of touching everyone he met, walking into a room and making an impression. He was a special soul.”
Only two bones were ever recovered of her brother’s remains, and these were flown to Toronto for burial, transported with full ceremonial honours. Carter recounts visiting his grave yearly on the anniversary of his death, sitting down to speak with him and enjoying their shared favourite, a tuna sandwich and coffee.
“I always feel his presence at this time of year,” she says. “I’m older, and we were connected from the day he was born. It never gets easier. You learn to cope, and life does go on, but I lost my closest friend that day. Over 2 000 people died that day but, to me, only Edmund died. I will always miss him.”
Letters/Discussion Forums7 days ago
An open letter to President Cyril Ramaphosa
OP-EDS7 days ago
Why it must be cool to be a Jew on campus
Featured Item7 days ago
Could vaccination save Netanyahu’s political life?
Featured Item7 days ago
Farewell to an architectural giant
Voices7 days ago
But he is good for Israel
Voices7 days ago
The holiday that couldn’t happen
Voices7 days ago
Second waves and second chances
Featured Item7 days ago
A December of COVID-19, paranoia and cancelled plans