NEWSLETTER SUBSCRIPTION


click to dowload our latest edition

CLICK HERE TO SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

News

Ball in Roedean’s court after another resignation

Published

on

The Roedean School tennis saga continues to gather pace, with no promised rematch likely any time soon. 

Days after the principal of Roedean, a top private school for girls, resigned following an antisemitic incident over a tennis match, the chairperson of the board has now stepped down. 

A Change.org petition launched by parents unhappy about the decision to apologise to King David for antisemitism is gaining traction, while an Old Roedeanian has circulated a call for respect and calm. King David has accepted the apology, but Roedean is scrambling to steady its game. 

Roedean has made no contact with King David High School since apologising on 12 February, despite its commitment to continuing to work with King David and “rescheduling the match for our girls”. 

In a letter to parents, staff, and members of the Roedean community dated 16 February 2026, the board confirmed that it had accepted the resignation of Chairperson Dale Quaker with immediate effect. It said Quaker’s decision followed “careful reflection” on the pressure the recent period had placed on him and his family, noting that public commentary had crossed acceptable boundaries and affected their sense of safety and well-being. 

“The stepping down and resignations have much to do with not having been prepared to handle the issue truthfully from the get-go, and thus failing to act with real conviction,” said Sara Gon, fellow of the Institute of Race Relations. 

“So, in having raised issues that weren’t correct or pertinent, the Roedean side came out looking evasive and uncertain about issues on which there should be clear principle. The criticism should be expected in a situation of prevarication. The pressure to resign was clearly considerable,” she said. 

The Roedean board expressed gratitude for Quaker’s leadership during what it described as a particularly demanding chapter in the school’s history, and said it remained fully constituted and operational, with no disruption to governance or daily academic and co-curricular activities. Thembi Mazibuko was appointed interim chairperson with immediate effect. 

Quaker’s resignation comes shortly after the departure of Roedean’s principal, Phuti Mogale, intensifying focus on the school’s leadership. The board’s apology to King David School has drawn criticism from some within Roedean’s broader community. 

The petition expresses dissatisfaction with the decision to apologise to King David. While acknowledging the need to reject antisemitism, the petition argues that the board’s statement didn’t sufficiently recognise what it describes as the constitutional rights of parents and pupils to act in accordance with conscience and political belief. It contends that the incident was framed primarily as discrimination, without adequately distinguishing between antisemitism and political objections related to Zionism and Israel. 

The petition calls for clearer differentiation between antisemitism and political dissent, and urges the school to affirm freedom of conscience and facilitate internal dialogue. 

At the same time, an open letter by Gontse Nkwe, a former pupil at Roedean and current parent, South African Old Roedeanian Association (SAORA) committee member, and Roedean School board member, has sought to encourage reflection. Writing in her personal capacity, Nkwe said she was responding to questions, frustrations, and expectations of SAORA during a difficult period. 

Nkwe emphasised that SAORA was an independent body focused on stewardship of values and continuity across generations, not on day-to-day governance. She acknowledged the pressure on the school to “take a side”, but argued that Roedean had historically taught its pupils “how to think, not what to think”, and to engage thoughtfully with complex issues. 

Nkwe noted that a formal process was taking place to examine whether systems had functioned as they should, and said the work focused on understanding structural breakdowns and restoring alignment with shared values. 

“At Roedean, we were taught that it is possible – and necessary – to live and work alongside people whose views, beliefs, histories, and identities differ profoundly from our own. Respect doesn’t require agreement, and holding one’s own position doesn’t require the erasure of another’s. Tolerance isn’t a slogan but a lived discipline,” she writes. 

The board has stated that with an interim chairperson now in place and a review process under way, the school continues to address concerns raised within its community. 

In earlier correspondence, the board said the decision to cancel the tennis fixture was taken without the board’s knowledge, and didn’t reflect the views of Roedean’s broader constituencies, including current and past students, parents, staff, and the board itself. 

“Rebuilding trust will require transparency, accountability, and consistency from the board and leadership,” it said. 

The ball now rests in Roedean’s court, with King David awaiting word on a rematch. 

Continue Reading
4 Comments

4 Comments

  1. Ian Levinson

    February 19, 2026 at 10:31 am

    Roedean’s leadership crisis is not the real issue here — antisemitism is. Attempts to spin petitions against the apology only prove how necessary that apology was. Antisemitism is not a “difference of opinion” or a matter of school politics; it is discrimination, and it harms Jewish pupils directly.

    King David High School showed dignity in accepting Roedean’s apology. That acceptance deserves respect, not undermining. The fact that Roedean has yet to follow through on its promise of a rematch only deepens the sense of avoidance.

    If Roedean truly wants to steady its game, it must stop equivocating and start acting: rebuild trust through accountability, transparency, and concrete steps. Antisemitism has no place in our schools, our communities, or our country — and no petition will change that.

    • Gaeleen van den Bergh

      February 21, 2026 at 12:52 pm

      Agree Unless Antisemitism is wiped out there can be no peace.
      Further, Rhodean should not have agreed to play in the beginning if there was an issue. Why do it in such a way to ‘grab ‘ attention?

    • Ryan

      February 21, 2026 at 5:18 pm

      So the petition against the apology argues that taking a stand against Zionism is different to discrimination

      If it is okay for you to refuse to play a match against a Jewish person due to your differences with Netanyahu’s government,
      Then it would also be acceptable to refuse to play with a black person due to your objections to the criminality of the ANC.

      Why is the same action considered racist discrimination if done to a black person, but rightful protest if done to a Jew?

      This proves that antisemitism abounds and the Jewish community is not overreacting or being sensitive here. They’re rightfully refusing to put up with South Africa’s double standards on this matter.

  2. Mike Wiggill

    February 20, 2026 at 5:00 pm

    It seems, based solely on the limited information in the public domain, that the staff, parents and pupils at King David are showing more maturity, more humanity and more willingness to simply get along and accept that the pplitical and religious views of others may differ to their own, but that does not mean one is better than the other.
    What does a difference in political or religious views have to do with the children playing a tennis match against one another?

    In a world of so many religions, so many political viewpoints (just look at the ridiculous number of “political parties” in South Africa alone) it should have less than nothing to do with an inter-school sporting event.

    Parent organizations and school boards have a responsibility to guide the pupils, not use them as pawns in their personal game of political chess.

Leave a Reply

Comments received without a full name will not be considered.
Email addresses are not published. All comments are moderated. The SA Jewish Report will publish considered comments by people who provide a real name and email address. Comments that are abusive, rude, defamatory or which contain offensive language will not be published.