GEOFF SIFRIN
South African Jewry has long been in distress because of political chaos in the country, its attempts to find its place here as a minority group, and its rapidly shrinking size. It is less than half the size it was in the 1970s, and many of its best and brightest have left for safer shores. Given these internal problems, it appears there is little appetite for involvement in wider matters such as the migrants.
Jews are justifiably proud of Israel, without having to trumpet its achievements to the world. However, there are moments in a nation’s history when it must do something extremely public to affirm its core. This is such a moment. The status of “refugee” is central to the Jewish historical experience, and Jews are being put in the position one generation later of making such a decision for others.
Some 72% of the migrants are Eritrean and 20% Sudanese. They arrived between 2006 and 2012 to escape war and repression. Many live in south Tel Aviv.
The Knesset gave Netanyahu the power to deport them or imprison those refusing to leave “voluntarily”. There have been accusations from Israelis that they have contributed to rising crime in the area and committed other misdemeanours. Many Israelis want them out.
Does this little South African Jewish community have anything useful to say? The mandate of its representative organisations is to “protect the Jewish way of life”. Could this way of life include something about treating migrants? We have witnessed myriad times in South African history the effects on helpless people of governments shunting them off to inhospitable places.
Menachem Begin gave us the opposite example in 1977 when, in one of his first acts after becoming Israeli prime minister, he welcomed 66 Vietnamese “boat people” who had been rescued at sea. He compared them to Jewish refugees seeking refuge during the Holocaust. He granted them citizenship. Israel was praised for its humanity.
Refugees from war and disaster zones globally are more numerous today than at any time since World War II, and are estimated at 66 million by the UN Refugee Agency. Some Western countries have taken a number in; others have refused. The 38 000 in Israel constitute one-half of 1% of Israel’s population – currently no threat to its demography, although obviously the future is uncertain.
Netanyahu’s intention to eject them has evoked protest in the Jewish world. Nearly 800 American Jewish clergymen signed an open letter urging him to cancel the deportations; two former heads of the foreign ministry, Nissim Ben Sheetrit and Alon Liel, have protested; and 147 Israeli academics, 35 former diplomats and Israeli Holocaust survivors have voiced their opposition.
El Al pilots have said they will refuse to fly deportees to Africa. The US-based New Israel Fund, refugee support group HIAS and rights group T’ruah have joined. Jonathan Greenblatt, national director and CEO of the Anti-Defamation League, has protested, as has the Jewish Council for Public Affairs. Irwin Cotler, former justice minister in Canada who chairs the Raoul Wallenberg Centre for Human Rights in Montreal and has dealt with African migrant matters for more than a decade, has lobbied against deportation. And Netanyahu has accused George Soros, international humanitarian and philanthropist, of backing protests.
Are there any voices from rabbis, leaders or others here which might add a South African angle to the debate?
It would be interesting to hear the views of South African Jews – whether they agree with Netanyahu’s plan or not – on something that is not about running Israel, but about a moral issue.
Read Geoff Sifrin’s regular columns on his blog sifrintakingissue.wordpress.com
