Subscribe to our Newsletter


click to dowload our latest edition

Israel was right to refuse Nzimande visa – Levitas

Cape Fed chairman Ben Levitas, pictured, writing on Policsweb on Monday, explains why he believes that Israel acted correctly in denying Blade Nzimande an entry visa. the minister actively sought the severing of links between UJ and Ben-Gurion University, says Levitas.

Published

on

Featured Item

BEN LEVITAS

Israel acted with good reason to refuse Blade Nzimande entry

The SA Minister of Higher Education actively activated and propagated the severing of links between the University of Johannesburg and The Ben-Gurion University, in Beersheva. Nelson Mandela accepted an honorary doctorate from this Israeli university, specifically for the groundbreaking work that the University of the Negev, was doing to uplift Africa.

Blade1 FULLBen-Gurion University leads the world in combating desertification and in finding solutions to agriculture under harsh conditions. It leads the world in water purification and in combating food supply issues.


RIGHT: Higher Education Minister Blade Nzimande


Until relations were severed, Israel was helping South Africa with infrastructure projects and with finding solutions to food security. So, while those propagating sanctions won this battle, South Africa’s ability to win its war to increase food supplies has suffered a huge set back. Ben-Gurion University ranks far higher in International rankings than does the University of Johannesburg, and the spiteful boycott would certainly hurt our local institution more than the Israeli institution.

By calling for the boycotting of all Israeli Institutions Nzimande certainly deserves the opprobrium of his countrymen who seek only positive solutions to the problems we all face.  There can be no reason or justification for a minister of education, to call for such a boycott and all the steps Israel has taken to counter his agenda are entirely understandable and justified.

Nzimande has overstepped the line of protocol by the slanderous remarks he has made in many of his speeches, accusing Israel of committing “massacres” and “genocide”. While his support of the Palestinians is understandable, his focus only on Israel’s alleged actions and not on Palestinian provocations is entirely unjustified and weakens his case.

While the whole Middle East is in flames, and genocide against Christians and other minorities is rampant and pursued as a deliberate policy, Nzimande is silent. In Syria alone the number of deaths exceeds the lives lost in all the Israel/Palestinian conflicts by a factor of 20 times and the number of refugees exceeds by 5 times the number of Palestinians that became refugees following Israel’s creation.

Nzimande overlooks completely the fact that Israel is the only bastion in the whole Arab world and Middle East that is a true democracy, which protects minority rights. Arabs have full democratic rights to vote, and 12 per cent of the parliamentarians are Arab. Arabs hold positions as judges, generals, pop stars and beauty queens. Israel’s citizens have just been chosen as one of the top 10 countries, with the happiest citizens.

In past polls, given the choice Arab citizens would choose to live in Israel rather than in an independent Palestine – that says it all. By castigating only Israel, the most moral and free society in a dark and destructive region, Nzimande becomes complicit in condoning the worst human rights violations and crimes.

Nzimande may need to be reminded, that there were no universities or institutes of higher learning in Palestine, until after Israel took over in 1967. Instead of acknowledging Israel’s bequest and contribution to Palestinian development, he chooses only to rubbish it. This mean spiritedness deserves the reaction that Israel choose to take, because nothing good could come out of a visit by Nzimande to the region.

Nzimande is stuck in a communist mind frame which harks back to a colonialist period. He views Israelis as settlers and “colonialists”, while nothing can be further from the truth. Jews have lived in “Palestine” continuously for longer than any other people. The Palestinians are certainly not the indigenous or aboriginal people that he makes them out to be.

Yasser Arafat and many of the current leaders were not born in Palestine and the Arabs entered Israel only after 2 000 years of Jewish settlement. Religion being “the opium of the masses”, perhaps Nzimande needs to be reminded that Jesus Christ was born and died a Jew and that he preached in a Jewish Temple, one thousand four hundred years before the first Muslim appeared in Jerusalem.

Nzimande has a huge task on his hands raising the skill levels of the people that he serves. Where South Africa fails, Israel excels. Israel produces entrepreneurs and innovators. Israel produces more Nobel Prize-winners pro rata than any other country, yet Nzimande chooses to disregard their achievements and partake in boycotts and discrimination.  The people of South Africa deserves more from their leaders and Nzimande is a victim of his own ineptitude and poisonous agenda.

  • Ben Levitas is chairman of the SA Zionist Federation Cape Council

Continue Reading
8 Comments

8 Comments

  1. abu mamzer

    Apr 28, 2015 at 2:00 pm

    ‘With all the Ngaope abuse going on,isn’t it a case of opium being the religion of the masses?

    Or as they say in Yemen: Every Qat has nine wives.

    Comrade Avigdor knows well about Kommunizm…

    His bouncing skills have been well transformed into diplomatic punch.

    Wait for the protests from our left wing partisans…

    They’re still on the Bundwagon!

    ​’

  2. nat cheiman

    Apr 28, 2015 at 3:15 pm

    ‘Nzimande is not the sharpest blade in the toolshed.

    In fact he is a dumbkopf’

  3. Leslie Harris

    Apr 28, 2015 at 11:27 pm

    ‘Well said, Mr Levitas!

    Now if only the authors of that abominable statement could sit next to you… maybe some of your seichel will rub off on them!’

  4. Choni

    Apr 29, 2015 at 8:09 am

    ‘Well said indeed Mr. Levitas, but your \”boss\” in Johannesburg – the other Ben- seems to disagree with you. Stay firm Mr. Levitas.’

  5. shmuel

    Apr 30, 2015 at 2:59 pm

    ‘Israel definitely acted correctly in denying ANC Minister Nzimande a visa to enter \”Palestine\” as no such state exists currently,unless he meant Arab \”Palestine on the Eastbank of the River Jordan,where the Jordanian Embassy in Amman can issue a legitimate visa to enter Arab \”Palestine\” !’

  6. Willie Paterson

    May 3, 2015 at 4:59 am

    ‘Excellent article, Ben.’

  7. nat cheiman

    May 4, 2015 at 1:28 pm

    ‘Man, is that guy ugly. He’s a world champ.’

  8. Debbie Mankowitz

    May 21, 2015 at 4:53 am

    ‘Outstanding article, succinct, with an accurate rendition of history expressed perfectly in one page!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Featured Item

Closer ties between Zim and Israel rattles ANC

Published

on

Zimbabwe and Israel have had full diplomatic relations since 1993, but further overtures by our northern neighbour to the Jewish state could cause conflict with South Africa, particularly certain factions in the African National Congress (ANC).

According to an article by Carien du Plessis published on News24 on Wednesday, 3 February, “Zimbabwe has been seeking closer ties with Israel in the hope of securing more investment and doing away with sanctions. This move has caused unease within the ANC, which has a pro-Palestinian stance, although it’s unlikely the party will act on it.

“The ruling party [in Zimbabwe], ZANU-PF, has historically positioned itself as pro-Palestinian, but Zimbabwean President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s latest move closer to Israel represents a change in policy direction,” Du Plessis writes.

She reports that although the head of the ANC committee on international relations, Lindiwe Zulu, said that, “We cannot interfere with the sovereign decisions of the governing party of any other government”, there have been divisions within ZANU-PF and within the ANC about the Israel matter.

“A pro-Palestine lobby within the ANC wants South Africa’s governing party to take a more hardline approach to its Zimbabwean counterpart, while the pragmatists prefer not to push this issue for diplomatic reasons,” Du Plessis says.

Darren Bergman, the shadow minister for international relations and cooperation and a member of the Southern African Development Community (SADC) Parliamentary Forum Human Rights Committee, didn’t mince his words about South Africa’s response.

“The people of Zimbabwe are suffering. The internal affairs of Zimbabwe couldn’t get South Africa to act, the situation in Zimbabwe couldn’t get South Africa to act, but the relationship with Israel gets South Africa to act,” he said.

“This is a sinister situation that must make the SADC and African Union [AU] question what exactly South Africa’s situation is with regard to the Middle East,” Bergman said.

“It’s one thing to have an opinion and a position, but it’s another to keep a hard-pressed, almost spiteful stance at all times that can actually harm and injure the people and the continent. To this I would say that South Africa should show diplomatic constraint, and hold back.”

One of Mnangagwa’s recent moves to improve relations with Israel is the appointment last year of Israeli national Ronny Levi Musan as honorary consul of Zimbabwe to Israel.

The Afro-Middle East Centre reported in October 2020 that, “Musan has set plans into motion for Mnangagwa’s official visit to Israel. His activities in Zimbabwe include collaboration with Pentecostal churches to push for Christian support for Israel. Zimbabwe’s honorary consul is also pushing for Israeli businesses to invest in Zimbabwe’s agricultural sector, and he recently announced the intention to open an Israeli academy of agriculture in Zimbabwe. On the diplomatic front, Israel hopes that Mnangagwa will follow the example of his Malawian counterpart, Lazarus Chakwera, who announced plans to open an embassy in Jerusalem.”

Musan told the SA Jewish Report he had worked in Africa for the past 20 years to strengthen links between churches and the Holy Land. “About five years ago, I was invited to visit Zimbabwe which lasted about two weeks. I tried to do everything possible to connect Zimbabwe to Israel on a practical level. After the first visit, I visited Zimbabwe several more times, and met a number of ministers and church leaders, and just fell in love with the place.

“From there, it continued through my activities with the Israeli foreign ministry and the foreign ministry in Zimbabwe to promote diplomatic relations between the countries.” He was eventually appointed to this role.

“My main responsibility is to do everything possible in every field to bring knowledge and support from Israel to Zimbabwe, and vice versa. The main issue is technology in the field of agriculture, education, and innovation. These are the cornerstones that will return the crown to Zimbabwe as the ‘grain basket of Africa’.”

Local political analyst Daniel Silke says that Zimbabwe’s overtures to Israel “could well be an attempt by Zimbabwe to follow the Sudan example, in which currying favour with the United States via the channel of restoring relations with Israel allows the country to receive assistance and perhaps even escape some of the worst sanctions. But, of course, [former US] President Donald Trump is no longer in the White House. Whether this will have any traction with Joe Biden, who I think will be a lot more critical of the Zimbabwean regime, remains to be seen.”

In terms of the impact it could have on South African-Israel relations, Silke says, “Many other African countries are forging their own path in terms of relations with Israel. For President [Cyril] Ramaphosa, it’s a difficult balancing act given the demands from within his own party. But I don’t think South Africa has any leg to stand on in terms of interference with any country which wishes to forge some sort of close relationship with the Jewish state. As head of the AU, Ramaphosa is again in a tough position because of the changing dynamics across Africa, but I don’t think it’s an issue that will really get much attention.”

Rowan Polovin, the chairperson of the South African Zionist Federation, says, “We see this as a positive development, particularly for Southern Africa, which is part of the momentum that is being created by the Abraham Accords.

“Northern Africa has been very much part of the momentum. In the southern region, Malawi, which is diplomatically and geographically close to South Africa, has signalled its intention to open an embassy in Israel. If all this has an impact on South Africa’s neighbours, then South Africa will see the benefits. It’s very hard to ignore the importance of building ties with Israel, which has so many solutions for African issues, particularly water, electricity, agriculture, and security. Notwithstanding the noise that the ANC might make, ultimately it’s positive.”

Continue Reading

Featured Item

Just how successful is Israel’s vaccine push?

Published

on

Israel is reporting promising initial results from its COVID-19 vaccine rollout, the fastest in the world.

The first official findings released by the health ministry show that only 0.04% of people caught the virus a week after their second dose, and a mere 0.002% needed hospital treatment.

Clalit, the country’s largest health service organisation, has also released its preliminary data. It compared 200 000 people aged 60 and over who’ve been vaccinated with 200 000 similar unvaccinated older adults. It found that the rate of those who tested positive dropped 33% among the vaccinated 14 days after they received it. No decline was seen in the unvaccinated.

Maccabi, another healthcare organisation, saw an even larger drop. Infections decreased 60% among 430 000 people 13 to 21 days after they received the vaccine. The data also suggested the vaccine was 92% effective, close to the 95% efficacy claimed by Pfizer.

Israeli researchers are conducting more in-depth analysis, and point out that real-world effectiveness of vaccines is often lower than the efficacy seen in clinical trials due to a number of factors.

But experts warn that this data has yet to be published in a peer-reviewed journal so it should be viewed with some caution.

There are also various factors that could be influencing the results. The current lockdown and behaviour such as travelling and gathering less, wearing masks, and greater physical distancing might be decreasing infections.

The first people to receive the vaccine were mostly from vulnerable populations, so they are more likely to take precautions which could also skew the data.

In spite of the encouraging news, the death toll from COVID-19 continues to climb. Of the 4 816 fatalities at the time of writing, 30% occurred in January when the vaccination rollout was already in full swing. The government blames this on the more transmissible British variant of the virus, especially among children. According to Clalit, when the vaccination campaign started in late December, the new variant caused 30% to 40% of infections, whereas now that figure has doubled.

As for the South African strain, there are currently 80 detected cases in Israel, and there is concern that the vaccine isn’t as effective against this variant. A number of Israelis who previously had COVID-19 have been re-infected with the South African strain, with the most recent case identified two days ago.

Compounding the situation is the flagrant disregard by the ultra-Orthodox community, that comprises just less than 13% of the population, for lockdown rules. Since the start of the pandemic, one in five ultra-Orthodox has tested positive.

Many in the community doubt the safety of the vaccine or believe the country’s citizens are being used as guinea pigs to test its efficacy. Prominent rabbis have also said that communal prayer and study needs to overwrite lockdown concerns.

Last Sunday, 31 January, thousands of ultra-Orthodox mourners, many without masks, crowded together to attend two funerals of famous rabbis who died from coronavirus. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been criticised for not cracking down harshly enough on the community for political reasons – he needs their votes in the upcoming 23 March election.

Residents of Tel Aviv spoke to the SA Jewish Report, complaining that the actions of the ultra-Orthodox were forcing the whole country to go repeatedly into lockdown, and it wasn’t fair. It’s no surprise thus that the latest word from the government is that the current – third – nationwide lockdown may not be Israel’s last.

Many Israelis want cities and towns to once again be divided into red, orange, yellow, and green zones and scales of restrictions to be put in place accordingly. This would mean those who obey the restrictions wouldn’t have to pay the price of those who don’t.

In recent days, there’s also growing concern in some quarters in Israel that because the mass vaccination campaign is running in parallel with an active coronavirus outbreak, it could lead to an “evolutionary pressure” on the virus in which it would ultimately become immune to vaccination. Doctors are suggesting that in future, people will need to take an annual anti-COVID-19 jab, much in the same way the annual flu injection is taken.

But for now, the race to innoculate everyone is on. Among the first to be injected were people aged 60 or older. More than two-thirds of this age group have already received the required two doses. Up to 200 000 people are being injected each day, and the vaccine is now available to anyone over the age of 35. High-school students aged 16 to 18 are also included in the hope that they will be able to sit for exams. It seems Netanyahu is on track to fulfil his promise of innoculating five million of the country’s nine million citizens by the end of March.

To date, just more than one in three Israelis has been inoculated – about 1.7 million of them twice. Because this is a far higher fraction than anywhere else in the world, it makes the country a test case for the international vaccine push.

Continue Reading

Featured Item

The right to demonstrate, even during lockdown

Published

on

Israelis are being allowed out of their homes in full lockdown to call for the resignation of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (Bibi), who is viewed by many on both sides of the political spectrum as corrupt.

This freedom in a lockdown which ordinarily limits you to being no more than one kilometre from your house is based on the country’s constitutional right to protest. On bridges, at junctions, and outside Bibi’s house in Jerusalem, daily protests occur, resuming after Shabbat goes out on Saturday night.

Lech! Lech!” (Go!) is shouted loudly – which is also the name for the movement against Netanyahu.

There are some staunch Likud followers who scream, “Arafat and Rabin sold out the country,” prompting laughter amongst some demonstrators, who point out that their arguments are old and outdated. Demonstrators including doctors, lawyers, pilots, accountants, and students point out that this isn’t about the Israel-Palestine issue, it’s not about being leftist or rightist, but about ethics and bringing to justice an allegedly corrupt prime minister.

The protestors are passionate, some defying orders not to camp outside Bibi’s residence. At 21:30, police order the drums, trumpets, and whistles to cease. The protestors obey, but continue to demonstrate quietly, so as not to disturb the Jerusalem neighbourhood.

Then, at about 23:00, carrying Israeli flags in blue and white and others in red and white, the protestors pack up and go home to lockdown.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Naale Elite Academy

Trending